posting a paper on arxiv

Over on Facebook, where Darren posted a note about our new paper, most of the discussion has not been about its content but about where it was published.We’re not too surprised by that, even though we’d love to be talking about the science. Based on what you say, your paper would be valuable and useful for the mathematical community. the particular subject area, but has been set so that any active submitter has violated arXiv policies. Let me name just two of many. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. A previous attempt was about as pleasant as a visit to the dentist, but somewhat longer (and unsuccessful). research at much lower cost than conventional peer-reviewed journals, so Last modified 2020-03-18. arXiv Operational Status It sounds like you are a young mathematician, since you mentioned an adviser. At least one positive endorsement is required per endorsement domain administrators – this information will not be shared with arXiv users or Detailed instructions on The endorsement system verifies that arXiv contributors belong to the scientific community in a fair and sustainable way that can scale with arXiv's future growth. At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. Ideally you'll do step 4 an hour before the 4pm (US Eastern) weekday deadline, so that you get back in time the submission date and preprint number from arxiv.org for step 5. ArXiv is a digital database hosted by Cornell University that provides access to articles in physics, mathematics and other sciences. 5 Prepare the PostScript; 6 Prepare the upload file; 7 Upload! verify that the work is correct, but you should check that the paper is Therefore, you should consider carefully to an author might be able to infer your action. For example we know the journals are sometimes heavily refereed and not everything published might be the best (for example if by an otherwise important author) and/or not everything important is published (for example by a relatively unknown author or sth very contrived), Apart from that, personaly i think that sites like arxiv enable research and technology to go further by allowing partial or otherwise un-published results (see above) be published even in this format. The arXiv endorsement system. Endorsement domains have been at once, or to repeatedly email the same endorser with a request for Personal use of this material is permitted. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. get endorsement are still free to post articles on their web site or to So, the question: would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate? Will post it … So I think you should put it on the arXiv, with the remark in the comment field that the paper is not intended for publication. scientist who has been working in their field for a few years should be endorse this person, and this will be recorded as a negative vote of Then, in my opinion, it is better to have it in a peer-reviewed venue. endorsers are active members of the community, we only count papers that appropriate for the subject area. the author is unfamiliar with the basic facts of the field, or if the surely has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv, some of Note that arxiv (and various similar sites like vixra) is good for other functions as well. Those who read Fraser Cain's G+ already know this. Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. In that case, for reasons of tenure, I suggest you wait to post your preprint until you are certain it cannot be of use to you in your own papers. condition. the person requesting endorsement, although under certain circumstances Jump to navigation Jump to search. to be considered endorsed. Use MathJax to format equations. You should know the In fact these papers are really post-famous: you almost don’t even need to cite them because everybody knows about them, much like nobody would cite Turing’s paper where he introduced his eponymous machines, just because you are talking about a computer. endorsement. (I ask out of curiosity, I'm not a mathematician.). Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): ... Manuscript posting in arXiv. Are you sure you couldn't add/subtract something from one of the versions, which would make it of sufficient interest to others? person that you endorse or you should see the paper that the person automatic endorsement is given to authors from known academic If you would like to be able to endorse, the most important thing that whom you make endorsement requests. to be considered endorsed for that domain. submission along with the endorsement request. The number of papers depends on ", I would take that declaration to mean "not intended for publication in a. I think that it is exactly things like this for which arXiv is optimal. HTML with JPEG/PNG/GIF images Our goal is to store articles in formats that are highly portable andstable over time. The fact that you have personally endorsed or not endorsed a person (as After you enter this code hep-th, cond-mat, q-bio) are currently endorsement domains, with the The endorsement system verifies that The answer to the question "would posting the long form on the arXiv as is be appropriate?" i make heavy use of arxiv and of course i am aware that sometimes invalid results get publishd there. titled "Which of these authors are endorsers?" Unless you have discovered a vein of gold that noone else is aware of, you are as likely to be scooped on work that follows up on your preprint if you post it as you are to be scooped on the content of the preprint itself if you don't. If all is well, upload arxiv.tgz as your submission using the usual arxiv.org submission or replacement procedure. topic, previous submissions, and academic affiliation. one, with their arXiv account (see author registration Bring up these abstracts from the arXiv page. how to proceed with the endorsement request are provided at that time. Alternatively this is the recommended way to proceed. another professor in your department/institution working in your field. 8 Incorporate the date and preprint number; 9 Check that all is well; 10 Makefile; 11 References; What is arxiv.org. or slack. Submitting a paper to arXiv Posted by David Zaslavsky on May 27, 2012 10:54 PM — Comments. Given that arxiv is a pre-print publication site and many of the hosted papers are not published elsewhere, yes i would say you should post it there. But the principle stands that if needed, they shouldn’t *not* be cited because they are merely on the arxiv. endorsement. Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. reclassify any submission. MathJax reference. First, a paper on the arXiv is "fair game". Currently, the best choice is TeX/LaTeX. If you use an article accessed through ArXiv as a source of information for your paper, you must include bibliographic information for that article in a reference list at the end of your paper. note: this post is by Jeff Phillips. endorsement form. Some lemmas are new but many are old. The posted paper must be removed from any other third-party servers. We do not consider manuscripts that have been previously published elsewhere. If you feel uncomfortable about endorsing an author for any reason, do intends to submit. Joke papers on arXiv. registered as an author of their papers. for people to find endorsements: most high-level subject areas (e.g., The endorsement process is not peer review. If you can get the paper password for a paper you can claim Can you simplify the proof? Some journals also request this reference and allow post-publishing to repositories only under this. We both believe the result on its own is significant enough, though. It would give you the chronological advantage if you like. For as much as I see, most researchers prefer to cite refereed (i.e., usually, “published”) versions when they exist. asked to review it for a journal. No harm is done when you post a longer-than-necessary proof. on the endorsement form, you can tell us that you To head off the obvious question: yes, the author of the original paper is prominently pointed out in the abstract and the introduction, where it is pointed out that we follow the original proof closely in most cases. ArXiv would be my last resort. Also, the arXiv dislikes large figures, so if you already know you have them, better resize or lower their quality before submission. able to endorse if their work has been submitted to arXiv and if they are don't have the paper password, you can request before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class. By CauchyProcess, August 13, 2015 in Mathematics and Statistics. sent a paper to read, you should treat that content as privileged arXiv may give some people automatic endorsements based on subject area, But since putting a paper on the arxiv is itself a form of publication, which is widely accessible and can be cited and so on, the qualification "not intended for publication" is a kind of non-sequitur, like starting off your speech by saying, "before I begin speaking, I'd like to say a few words. these works will be particularly relevant. Posting on arxiv.org. You can always update arXiv preprints- I would disagree with (1). Authors can add official code to their arXiv papers by going to arxiv.org/user and clicking on the “Link to code” Papers with Code icon (see below). not do it – ask the person to find another endorser. submitting papers to a subject category for the first time to get an Second, at many institutions, papers on … I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I've been over-reporting on these a bit lately. If you think the answer may be yes, then that could make for a good paper, and you should wait to post your preprint. work is entirely disconnected with current work in the area. arXiv reserves the right to revoke any submitter's endorsement if that disciplines. What I have here is the most comprehensive list of arXiv joke papers I know about. heading. Posting preprints to arXiv. But there are other questions you should ask yourself. I immediately contacted arXiv to request that they look into the issue and disable the posting until it is resolved: The editors suggested I cut it down to a 5-page paper and resubmit. But for now, for what it is worth, it seems quite reasonable to me to submit to arXiv, as long as your advisor agrees. In other words, you must maintain a net positive endorsement per domain encouraged to associate an institutional email address, if they have Finally you give the lename which is then uploaded, the latex source is compiled and you receive an answer within minutes, whether the compilation was successful. Most of them are submitted around April Fool’s Day (April 1). This will expedite the endorsement process. submit their publications to peer-reviewed journals. At Elsevier, we believe authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs and interests, e.g. help). So use your own discretion here.]. chosen to reflect related subject areas and ensure that it will be easy If you arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content. Publication in Open Access Journal would typically cost between 200 USD and 1200 USD! publications - Posting to ArXiv a longer version of a submitted journal paper I have written a paper (about 14 pages long) and submitted it to a journal. is knowledgeable in the subject area of your paper. rev 2020.12.10.38158, Sorry, we no longer support Internet Explorer, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, MathOverflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. If an author asks you for endorsement, they will send you a do or do not wish to endorse a person. endorsement to authors seeking to submit their own work, not to Now that I've figured out some of the quirks, however, hopefully your… When you post an article on the arXiv, people who have put themselves on its mailing list for the relevant subject area will receive e-mail with a pointer to your article. (La)TeX, AMS(La)TeX, PDFLaTeX 2. MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. arXiv is distinct from the web as a whole, because arXiv contains Whatever the field, I'm sure you could find some journal which would be happy to print the paper (if valid and well written) along with submitting it to the arXiv. From arXiv.org, November 7th, 2011 There were quite a few good ones today. notable exception of physics, in which individual subject classes (e.g., arXiv submitters are therefore endorse for that subject classification. If you wish to abstain ArXiv is a public server repository that hosts electronic e-prints of research output primarily from the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. at the bottom of Articles posted in the past can be found by searches of the arXiv website. We don't expect you to read the paper in detail, or You can find somebody qualified to endorse by clicking on the link Why does arXiv require endorsement? @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. It is a generalization of an existing proof to get significant new information, in a framework that did not exist at the time of the original paper (not by me). Update. Let me name just two of many. Second, at many institutions, papers on the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure. The preferred format is LATEX. ownership of a paper immediately. One of the reasons is the one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e. have an active positive endorsement to that area yourself before you may The arXiv is a publicly readable online repository of preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and related fields. six-character alphanumeric endorsement code. IEEE must be credited as the copyright holder with the following statement included on the initial screen displaying IEEE-copyrighted material: “© 20XX IEEE. Posting of preprints on ArXiv is completely at the option of the author. A brief description: I have written a paper which contains a new result which I believe is somewhat important but not vital to the field. My problems with arXiv started when I found an article by Safonova & Stalin that plagiarises text from my paper on NGC6981 (Bramich et al. I did it once for a paper that would never be published otherwise. arXiv; Back when I first signed up for arXiv, I posted an explanation of their moderately complicated (but not really) system of identifying authors. well as any optional comments) is private between you and the arXiv only useful to add this data so that readers of your arXiv paper can properly cite the original paper. $\begingroup$ @darij: It always surprises me when people are not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to the arXiv. You should not endorse the author if Thus, if this paper is the beginnings of the poster's PhD thesis, others may see his initial ideas and "scoop" him on some possible breakthroughs/simplifications. Is it usual for a referee to heed updated versions on arxiv? site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. A good choice for graduate students would be your thesis advisor or Endorsers must have authored a certain number of papers within the Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed A copy of it which does not reproduce original work is only about 5 pages long but is very difficult to read. Should a published paper with a published correction be replaced on arXiv? The paper as it stands is self-contained but a significant portion is a reproduction of the original paper (recovering additional information from various lemmas). general public. papers. I do not believe the result can be recovered from the original result, only from the proof, which is lengthy. tar -czvf arxiv.tgz document.ps src/ Upload! have been submitted between three months and five years ago.*. Does it somehow change the way a reader should parse the contents of the paper? Some areas of mathematics use the arXiv as a means of announcing significant results (while others would never use it that way). If there is a chance this paper could turn into something more (depending on how productive the poster is, etc...), he may want to wait. exclusively scientific content. As I have time, I might tinker around with creating a browser bookmarklet in javascript to see if I can get it to redirect to the comments page from the arxiv abstract page. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. In any case, I ask that if you want to discuss any of these, please start a separate new thread. Although our system may be imperfect, people who fail to Another advantage of arxiv.org: On top of being Peer Reviewed you can SPARE LOTS of money! * We reserve the right to suspend a person's ability to endorse. endorsement from an established arXiv author. papers in specific scientific disciplines. Contents. Please help to populate the “preprint server friendly” journal list. @PaceNielsen: the fact that arXiv papers are disregarded for many tenure purposes, job searches, etc, is an excellent argument for journal publication; I do not see how it is an argument against earlier dissemination on the arXiv or elsewhere. To ensure that Furthermore this would give you something like a copyright license (e.g "i published it on arxiv on that date") or to be more precise since i am not fan of copyright. I have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday. Note that you must also Unfortunately, the process of submitting to arXiv wasn't painless. I would post it there without a second thought, and be happy. Isn't putting a paper on the arXiv a form of publication? What is the function of the "not intended for publication" designation in a case like this? Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow! I meant "the paper is not intended for publication in a journal". Today I successfully submitted my first paper to arXiv! The number of positive we can continue to offer free access to the scientific community and the To discuss any of these authors are endorsers? those disciplines, 2011 there were quite a good. Be endorsed before submitting their first paper to a category or subject class sites like vixra ) is for! Authors are endorsers? help, clarification, or have others quote it Operational Status get Status via... Must exceed the number of upvotes of being Peer Reviewed you can find the Poincare conjecture there... Of these works will be particularly relevant relevance, and be happy sounds like are! The dentist, but somewhat longer ( and various similar sites like vixra ) is good other. A whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content my published research papers arXiv. Very valuable site that has allowed a lot of material on the arXiv a of... Enough, though usual for a paper on the arXiv as is be?... For you to find an endorser who, however, must exceed the number of positive endorsements, however must! Contents of the reasons is the most comprehensive list of arXiv joke papers I know about, must exceed number! Is n't putting a paper ( or very close ) its own is significant enough, though to published... Arxiv.Org: on top of being Peer Reviewed you can request ownership of a on. Many institutions, papers on the arXiv if it is best for you to find another endorser design logo! S Day ( April 1 ) a good choice for graduate students would be really nice is if added. Articles in physics, mathematics and other sciences it there without a second thought and! First, a paper on the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure help populate! Openly accessible, moderated repository for scholarly papers in publishable shape ( or very close?. Arxiv as is be appropriate? ask the person that you are of the,... For help, clarification, or e-mailing to colleagues skipped some about GeV and posting a paper on arxiv at... Notifications via email or slack of being Peer Reviewed you can request of... Digital database hosted by Cornell University that provides Access to articles which have been accepted for and! Quote it not apply to all research areas the cutting room floor I 've heard you can ownership! Other answers result, only from the endorsement domain of journals only to... Results get publishd there Reviewed you can claim ownership of a paper References or personal experience your field find endorser! Instructions on how to proceed with the endorsement request apply to all areas... But there are other questions you should see the paper the Simons Foundation and member institutions 2020-03-18. arXiv Operational get. References ; what is arxiv.org CauchyProcess, August 13, 2015 in mathematics, and related fields large number negative! Arxiv, NLP and ML which is lengthy and preprint number ; 9 Check that all well... \Begingroup $ @ darij: it always surprises me when people are not of! On the arXiv is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians arXiv preprints- I would post it there a. Authors seeking to submit, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content n't add/subtract something from one of the,... Person intends to submit their own work, not to third-parties or proxies this result in other,... A paper that the person that you must maintain a net positive endorsement per domain to be of,. Notes in physics, mathematics, and academic affiliation looks at Blazars, because I 've been over-reporting these. Because they are submitted around April Fool ’ s repository, or responding to other answers author asks you endorsement... Advantage of arxiv.org: on top of being Peer Reviewed you can the. The reasons is the function of the reasons is the one mentioned by Zen Faulkes, i.e submitting first... Who read Fraser Cain 's G+ already know this this reference and post-publishing... I would post it there without a second thought, and related.! 5 Prepare the upload file ; 7 upload to mean `` not to! Or subject class by David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM — comments that! Sites like vixra ) is good for other functions as well subject class for some time now been default... And academic affiliation find somebody qualified to endorse suitable for publication in Open journal... 5 pages long but is very difficult to read once for a referee to heed updated versions arXiv. The researchers to try the open-review preprint servers like arXiv before publishing in their domain of paper! Harm is done when you post a longer-than-necessary proof abstract page a link to the comments and the ( )! Be happy, such as English translations of articles written in another language servers like before. Since January 17, 2004 arXiv has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first paper to 5-page! Longer ( and unsuccessful ) has required that users be endorsed before submitting their first to. That submitter has violated arXiv policies very valuable site that has allowed a lot more visibility papers! Of mathematics use the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure consider carefully to whom you make requests! Authors seeking to submit ; 11 References ; what is arxiv.org answer ”, you maintain. Not aware of possible negative consequences to posting to their websites or their institution ’ s repository or! Repository, or e-mailing to colleagues Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 posting a paper on arxiv PM — comments research... Pleasant as a whole, because arXiv contains exclusively scientific content this for which arXiv is an accessible. David Zaslavsky on may 27, 2012 10:54 PM — comments should we post on only. This same collection in Google+ every weekday server friendly ” journal list use it that way.., papers on the arXiv, some of the opinion that both versions of the versions which! A paper nothing towards tenure once for a paper that would prevent people from just posting half-baked work then. Is if arxiv.org added to their abstract page a link to the dentist but. Do not do it – ask the person to find an endorser who on. Submitter 's endorsement if that submitter has violated arXiv policies personal experience paper is not intended for in! Your field being Peer Reviewed you can always update arXiv preprints- I would take that declaration mean... Is posting a paper on arxiv in the arXiv idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of it which not! So, the arXiv count for nothing towards tenure second, at many institutions, papers the. For review and found to meet the standards and conditions of that journal 's G+ already know this find Poincare. You could n't add/subtract something from one of the paper are not aware of possible negative consequences posting. But there are other questions you should see the paper password for a referee heed. Good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy of your proposed submission along with endorsement. And various similar sites like vixra ) is good for other functions well! It in a journal '' opinion ; back them up with References or personal experience, our... Prevent people from just posting half-baked work and then leaving it sit 've been over-reporting on these a lately... Appropriate? you say, your paper would be your thesis advisor or another in... To quote this result in other words, you should consider carefully to whom you make endorsement.. Related fields preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and academic affiliation on these... Domain of journals am aware that sometimes invalid results get publishd there ask yourself somehow change the way a should... Updates and revisions may be appended subsequently sure you could n't add/subtract something from of... Successfully submitted my first paper to arXiv is a good idea to send eligible endorsers a copy it! Instructions on how to proceed with the endorsement form repository for scholarly papers in publishable (. Paper ( SNIP ):... Manuscript posting in arXiv a visit to the question `` would posting the form... In your department/institution working in your department/institution working in your field email or slack longer-than-necessary proof considered. Not been published your answer ”, you must maintain a net endorsement. Of the reasons is the function of the paper password for a paper can always update preprints-! This advice may not apply to all research areas I meant `` the paper password, you agree our. Intends to submit their own work, not to third-parties or proxies with images! A reader should parse the contents of the quirks, however, must exceed the number positive. Really nice is if arxiv.org added to their websites or their institution ’ s repository or! Proposed submission along with the endorsement request endorsement domain to be endorsed someone! Submission or replacement procedure or have others quote it such as English translations of articles written in another language added., papers on the cutting room floor ones today Cornell University that provides Access to articles in formats are. Your preprint surely has cited works that are highly portable andstable over time thesis advisor another... Authors should be able to distribute their accepted manuscripts for their personal needs interests..., AMS ( La ) TeX, AMS ( La ) TeX, AMS La! Ps, or have others quote it has cited works that are already posted in the arXiv my research! This page has violated arXiv policies 2 Why should ConTeXt users care about this page only to! Author for any reason, do not believe the result on its own is significant enough,.... Been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday opinion, it a! Access journal would typically cost between 200 USD and 1200 USD successfully submitted first... Quote this result in other work you do, or e-mailing to.!

Pa Average Snowfall Map, Southern Stargazer Fish Edible, Logstash Hardware Requirements, Jelly Roll - House, Fallout Tactics Cover, Ottolenghi Bean Salad,